The number of times the nation's beaches were closed or posted with warnings because of polluted water jumped last year to its second-highest level in 21 years, in part because of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and heavy rains that swept pollutants into the ocean at an accelerated rate, according to a report released Wednesday. The Natural Resources Defense Council found that contamination from oil, urban runoff, and human and animal waste continued to take a toll on beaches across the country in 2010, according to the report. * Related * South Bay beaches hit by swarms of kelp flies South Bay beaches hit by swarms of kelp flies * Newport Beach lifeguards' retirement benefits scaled back Newport Beach lifeguards' retirement benefits scaled back * Lifeguards' special-status pensions under scrutiny in California Lifeguards' special-status pensions under scrutiny in California In California, where heavier than normal rainfall greatly increased the amount of water and pollutants being flushed into the ocean, closures and advisories nearly doubled, and the number of beach water tests that exceeded state health standards rose to 11% from 9% the year before. On the Gulf Coast, oil washed up on about 1,000 miles of shoreline. Since the spill, there have been so many oil-related closures, notices and advisories at beaches throughout the region that adding them all up totals 9,474 days, the report calculated. The study, which showed a 29% increase in advisories or closures over the previous year, indicates that "the problems that we have in this country with beach water contamination in general are not getting better," said Noah Garrison, an attorney for the environmental advocacy group. Because storm runoff is a top source of beach water pollution, closures closely mirror precipitation patterns. When it rains, viruses, bacteria, fertilizers, toxic metals, trash and other pollutants are swept into the ocean and warnings to keep out of the water are often posted. When the weather is dry, the beaches tend to be cleaner and stay open. The report surveyed bacteria test results at more than 3,000 beaches in 30 coastal and Great Lakes states. A high bacteria count means the beach water is likely to harbor pathogens that can sicken swimmers — causing skin rashes and stomach and respiratory illnesses, as well as other infections. The results highlight the need to halt urban runoff so that water quality doesn't wax and wane with the amount of rainfall, the group says. "Hoping that it isn't going to rain is not a viable storm water management strategy," Garrison said. There's an urgent need, Garrison said, to treat urban runoff before it is swept into the ocean. He suggested a key is investing in an improved "green infrastructure" that captures, diverts or treats storm water or lets it filter back into the ground to keep pollutants from washing into the ocean. The states with the most polluted beaches in 2010 were Louisiana, Ohio and Indiana, based on the percentage of times beaches failed to meet federal health standards. The cleanest beaches could be found in New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Hawaii and Delaware. California fell near the bottom, ranking 22nd out of 30 states. Three Southern California beaches made the report's list of Top 10 "Repeat Offender" beaches with chronic pollution problems: Avalon Beach on Catalina Island, Cabrillo Beach in San Pedro and Doheny State Beach in Dana Point.

Leading congressional Democrats immediately recoiled Tuesday from a new proposal to cut $600 billion in Medicare spending over the next decade — in part by raising the eligibility age.

Sens. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) unveiled the proposal as part of a bipartisan effort to produce the kind of savings necessary to achieve the $2 trillion in debt reduction both parties say is needed to convince reticent lawmakers to vote to raise the debt ceiling. It would raise Medicare’s eligibility age from 65 to 67 and assess higher premiums on wealthier seniors.

1823

Comments

* Weigh In
* Corrections?

Graphic
Motion graphic: A guide to understanding the federal debt

Motion graphic: A guide to understanding the federal debt

More on this Story

* Steven Pearlstein: Funding a brinkmanship addiction
* Tom Daschle: Washington’s leadership failure
* Mitch Daniels: Debt and American pessimism
* Ezra Klein: An imbalanced debate won’t lead to a balanced solution

View all Items in this Story

* Top Democrats reject new plan to cut Medicare spending
* Get the latest news from Post Business

Running in the red

Part 2: How the GOP’s no-tax orthodoxy came to be

The proposal echoes Republican demands that entitlement reform — especially deep cuts in Medicare spending — be a part of any agreement to raise the nation’s debt ceiling.

But the swift rejection of the proposal among Democrats reflects the significant obstacles that remain to any agreement to cut the deficit and raise the nation’s legal borrowing limit.

Positions on both sides have been hardening in recent days, as an Aug. 2 deadline for working out a deal before the nation defaults on its obligations approaches.

A previously scheduled White House meeting with top Senate Democrats on Wednesday will likely be devoted to the ongoing negotiations.

Republican leaders in the House and Senate have said there can’t be more progress made in negotiations until Democrats agree to entitlement cuts and forgo any new taxes.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who met with President Obama and Vice President Biden at the White House on Monday, said no additional talks had yet been scheduled.

Democrats insist that the deficit cannot be reduced by cutting spending alone. No deal is possible, they say, without an agreement to close tax loopholes that benefit the wealthy, including subsidies for major oil companies and a tax break provided to companies that buy private jets.

And they have promised they will not trim benefits to Medicare beneficiaries, a point underscored by their chilly reception of the plan advanced by Lieberman and Coburn.

The two senators conceded that their plan would be unpopular but said it presented the prescription to long-term health for the federal program.

“Our plan contains some strong medicine but that’s what it will take to keep Medicare alive. But we believe our plan administers that medicine in a fair way,” Lieberman said. “It asks just about everybody to give something to help preserve Medicare. But it asks wealthier Americans to give more than those who have less.”

With polls showing Medicare cuts deeply unpopular and a restive base anxious that their party may give away too much to achieve a debt deal, Democratic rejection of the proposal was swift.

Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) termed it “a bad idea.” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called it “unacceptable.”

“It is unfair to ask seniors to get less in benefits and wait longer to get onto Medicare — all while Republicans back tax breaks for big oil and corporations that ship American jobs overseas,” Pelosi said.

Economists and credit rating agencies have warned that financial markets may grow turbulent if political leaders cannot show they are making progress toward an agreement to raise the debt limit soon.

For weeks, Biden had been leading a series of closed-door talks with congressional leadership deputies that produced between $500 billion and $1 trillion in agreed upon cuts. But those talks stalled last week after House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) withdrew, citing Democratic insistence on raising taxes.

Now, Obama is working personally to broker agreement on the most difficult issues, including defense spending and entitlement cuts.

But those talks are likely to take place almost entirely in secret, and some rank-and-file Republicans have been smarting over the lack of transparency.

Sen. Ronald H. Johnson (R-Wis.) threatened Tuesday that he would delay further Senate action unless the talks are conducted more openly and Senate Democrats lay out a budget plan. He made good on his pledge late Tuesday, withholding his assent from ending a quorum call to allow a fellow Republican to speak.

“Unless we receive some assurance from the Democrat leadership that we will actually start addressing our budget out in the open, in the bright light of day, I will begin to object” to unanimous consent for business, which would signficantly delay Senate action, he said.